Hey, I'm curious to know which team you think has the league's worst WR's. I heard this question addressed by G. Cobb on WIP last night when he asked listeners to call in if they thought there was a team that had WR's that are WORSE than what the EAGLES have, and I would like to address this same ? to y'all. So please, feel free to chime in!
I personally like our young WRs but they aren't proven so in the eyes of the world they suck. A case could be made for Mushin Muhammad but he led the league in drops last year so F' him.
San Francisco has the worst group in the league. Antonio Bryant is an average wideout, and he is the banner name in this group. Rasheen Marshal has been a major bust, and Arnaz Battle is a marginal #4 guy let alone a starter.
The packers by far have the worst wr group in the NFL, the bears have muhamed that alone already makes them better then the whole packer unit as a whole.
saturn11 wrote: wow. as someone who lives in philly, i'm pleasantly surprised at how little discussion there is of philly in this thread. i hear nothing all-day but boo-hooing about our mediocre wideouts. so i have to ask: where would you rank reggie brown (iggles' best wr) in this list? coles bryant mooshy ernest wilford eddie kennison
1. Muhammad 2. Wilford 3. Bryant 4. Reggie Brown 5. Kennison 6. Coles
thanks for indulging me. mooshy first and coles last, eh?
and wilford that high, huh?
you may be right. what's your logic? i can't imagine ranking brown above coles...although he IS playing for a much better team. is that why coles is so low?
